Apple: Apple Watch makes its U.S. cover debut courtesy of Self Magazine

Apple Watch makes its U.S. cover debut courtesy of Self Magazine


It’s been a few months since the Apple Watch was featured on the cover of Vogue China, but now the upcoming gadget is finally making its debut on the cover of a U.S. magazine this month. Self Magazine announced today that its March issue will feature cover model Candice Swanepoel wearing Apple’s unreleased smartwatch.
Swanepoel’s Apple Watch of choice appears to be the low-end Sport model with the white sport band.

From Self:

Considering Swanepoel’s athletic prowess, it was an ideal accessory for her sporty cover shoot. She told SELF, “I’m an athlete. I use every single muscle, especially my core and arms, when I pose. It’s so important for me to feel strong!”

The Apple Watch was announced late last year and is scheduled to go on sale this April.

Belgian shop selling Tetris mugs electric razors promises Apple Watch on Valentines’ Day, “subject to availability”

T-Mobile CEO predicts Apple Watch will take wearables mainstream in 2015

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.

1. Leonson Stapleton says: it begins!
   
   LikeLiked by 1 person
2. acslater017 says: I wonder about her dimensions, and which size that is. She makes it look a little large.
   
   LikeLike
   • lkernan says: Are you saying her watch looks big in this??
     
     LikeLike
3. RP says: I wonder how this picture will age in say ten years. Tech and fashion both move at lightning speed, will it look completely dated?
   It’s a bit clunky but since it’s design is so clean it may not age as badly as computers and phones. Well, it will age better than android wear that’s for sure.
   
   LikeLiked by 1 person
   • cdm283813 says: I got my Android Wear watch because it was cheap and functional ($79 with $50 Google Play credit). I didn’t buy it as a fashion accessory with the idea that it would be worth more than what I paid for it. And I plan on replacing it when the round models get deeply discounted. Isn’t that true with smartphones, tablets and computers as well. Tech becomes worthless after so many years. Those 1st gen iPad’s are pretty much fancy picture displays after almost 5 years on the market.
     Will Apple promise that the resale value on the 1st gen watch will not decrease when Gen 2 is released? That’s why I think people are foolish to spend $1000’s on a smartwatch that will look less appealing a year from now.
     And who’s to say that Apple won’t replace the iPhone altogether in 10 to 20 years? Can’t assume that the tech we have today will be the tech we have 20 years from now.
     
     LikeLike
   • acslater017 says: Interesting thought. I would guess it’ll age well. Fashion changes, but watches don’t really. Tech progresses, but Apple designs are so thoughtful they age well too.
     The original iPhone is thick, slow, and low-res, but the hardware still looks cool today.
     
     LikeLike
     • RP says: I llove the way the original iPhone looks. A fantastic design. If it’s not already there, I wouldn’t doubt it will find itself at a museum of modern art.
       
       LikeLike
4. cdm283813 says: Fashion first. Function later.
   
   LikeLike
5. Lars Pallesen says: I don’t know about Apple’s strategy of selling the Apple Watch as a fashion item … One can hardly describe it as “elegant”.
   
   LikeLike